cd45 BBDO Loses Pepsi as Client Ad Bills Go Through the Roof | BNET Advertising Blog | BNET
On MovieTome: See the new trailer from STREET FIGHTER!

BNET Industries

BNET Advertising

Industry news and insights by Jim Edwards

BBDO Loses Pepsi as Client Ad Bills Go Through the Roof

By Jim Edwards | November 17th, 2008 @ 12:26 pm

46487-pepsi-newdesign_large.jpgAs Ad Age points out, BBDO’s loss of Pepsi will be a major psychological blow to the agency. Omnicom did well to keep the business in its network (the account is off to TBWA/Chiat/Day). But none of the coverage says why the brand chose to give BBDO the pink slip. Here’s one theory: BBDO was too expensive.

To read the press, you’d think that BBDO and Pepsi have been in a long, drawn-out, hair-pulling drama since about 2004. That was the year CEO Andrew Robertson fired creative chief Ted Sann without telling Pepsi.

Then Sann’s replacement, David Lubars, made himself the star of a decidedly mixed profile in New York mag, in which he was portrayed as a vitamin-popping workaholic who objected to the author calling Phil Dusenberry and Charlie Miesmer for comment. But I’m going to bet that this was less of a soap opera and more of a financial issue. Take a look at Pepsico’s income statement:

  • Revenue rose from $10.2 billion to $11.2 billion in the last quarter.
  • But net income went down, from $1.7 billion to $1.5 billion.

Isn’t that interesting — sales went up but Pepsico still managed to make less money.

A look at the line marked “Selling General & Administrative” gives the explanation, that’s the line where ad agency bills are recorded. That expense rose from $3.4 billion to $3.9 billion.* The results were similar for the first nine months of the year.

What this means is that although Pepsi’s advertising is getting people to buy more products, the ads are actually becoming more expensive than the extra sales they’re adding on. Pepsi spent $1 million just to redesign its logo for instance (although that cost was expensed to the Arnell Group, another Omnicom shop.) Not all of this money was spent on BBDO, of course — it covers all Pepsico’s shops on all its brands. But that’s the financial environment Pepsi is operating in.

So here’s my advice to TBWA/C/D: Make sure you bill at a significant percentage less than your sibling shop in Manhattan. Otherwise you won’t hold that account for very long.

*See note in the comments section.

Tags: Advertisement, PepsiCo, BBDO, Sales Strategy, Sales, Jim Edwards

Jim Edwards, a former managing editor of Adweek, has covered drug marketing at Brandweek for four years, and is a former Knight-Bagehot fellow at Columbia University's business and journalism schools.

Talkback Share your ideas and expertise on this topic Add your Opinion

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    BNET's Jim Edwards11/18/08 Report as spam
    1

    RE: BBDO Loses Pepsi as Client Ad Bills Go Through the Roof

    Obviously Pepsi doesn't spend $3.9 bill on BBDO alone. But it does spend that on all its agencies, above and below the line, and on media, and various retail activities etc., and distributon That's the only place where Pepsico details the totality of its marketing spend. BBDO's slice of that will be in proportion to the trend in the whole.

  •  
    BNET's Jim Edwards11/18/08 Report as spam
    2

    RE: BBDO Loses Pepsi as Client Ad Bills Go Through the Roof

    From BH:

    Before you embarrass yourself any further (the Saatchi/I Love NY story last week and now this story) you really need to do some homework on agency compensation. Do you really think that Pepsi paid agencies 3.9 billion dollars? That's way more than their entire ad budget.

    I don't have the time to go through their financial statement but I'm sure, as in the Saatchi story, you're confusing billings with agency compensation.

  •  
    BNET's Jim Edwards11/18/08 Report as spam
    3

    RE: BBDO Loses Pepsi as Client Ad Bills Go Through the Roof

    From BH:

    Jim,

    The thing that worries me is the implication in the post that the 3.9 billion substantially represents agency income, whether BBDO's or any other agency. In fact, I expect only a tiny fraction of that is agency income.

    While I have no access to their numbers, I think it is highly unlikely that Pepsi's advertising costs went up .5 billion dollars because of agency fees. It seems far more likely that it went up as the result of increased media buying or promotional activity.

    BH

  •  
    BNET's Jim Edwards11/18/08 Report as spam
    4

    RE: BBDO Loses Pepsi as Client Ad Bills Go Through the Roof

    Let's try this again without the typos:

    Obviously Pepsi doesn't spend $3.9 bill on BBDO alone. But it does spend that on ALL its agencies, above and below the line, and on media, and various retail activities etc., and distribution. The SG&A line is the only place where Pepsico details the totality of its marketing spend. BBDO's slice of that will be in proportion to the trend of the whole. Thus for Pepsico to increase its net income it must decrease its SG&A expenses -- and agency bills are a slice of that.

  •  
    seanclark11/19/08 Report as spam
    5

    RE: BBDO Loses Pepsi as Client Ad Bills Go Through the Roof

    It has very little, if anything, to do with agency cost as Chiat has never been a bargain and in fact, is one of the last to ever negotiate services....particularly creative.

    What this is indeed all about is Pepsi's stated objective of combing through all process, structure and channels to reinvent and reenergize a brand that is wilting.
    Indra Nooji has made it no secret that she is looking for innovative solutions, including cutting edge yet relevant marcom efforts.
    In that environment, Clow and the beach tyupically win out as the answer.

  •  
    BNET's Jim Edwards11/19/08 Report as spam
    6

    RE: BBDO Loses Pepsi as Client Ad Bills Go Through the Roof

    If, as you suggest, Pepsico's bills from Chiat go UP as its net income goes DOWN, then that will be news indeed.

What do you think?
The following tags are supported in BNET comments: <b></b> <i></i> <u></u> <pre></pre>
You are currently a guest | Login?
advertisement
advertisement
AboutAdvertising Industry

BNET Advertising provides daily industry news coverage and insights for managers and executives about the major companies in advertising, marketing, and public relations. In addition to detailed company profiles, we bring you critical analysis on new alliances and partnerships, mergers and acquisitions, cost management, new investments and deal flow, and other crucial business issues.

0